ABSTRACT
Respiratory muscles (RM) are a very important part of the respiratory system that enables pulmonary ventilation. This study aimed to assess the post-COVID-19 strength of RM by estimating maximum static inspiratory (MIP or PImax) and expiratory (MEP or PEmax) pressures and to identify the relationship between MIP and MEP and the parameters of lung function. We analyzed the data of 36 patients (72% male;median age 47 years) who underwent spirometry, and body plethysmography, diffusion test for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and measurement of MIP and MEF. The median time between the examinations and onset of COVID-19 was 142 days. The patients were divided into two subgroups. In subgroup 1, as registered with computed tomography, the median of the maximum lung tissue damage volume in the acute period was 27%, in subgroup 2 it reached 76%. The most common functional impairment was decreased DLCO, detected in 20 (55%) patients. Decreased MIP and MEP were observed in 5 and 11 patients, respectively. The subgroups did not differ significantly in MIP and MEP values, but decreased MIP was registered in the second subgroup more often (18%). There were identified no significant dependencies between MIP/MEP and the parameters of ventilation and pulmonary gas exchange. Thus, in patients after COVID-19, MIP and MEP were reduced in 14 and 31% of cases, respectively. It is reasonable to add RM tests to the COVID-19 patient examination plan in order to check them for dysfunction and carry out medical rehabilitation.Copyright © 2022 Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The respiratory pump that provides pulmonary ventilation includes the respiratory center, peripheral nervous system, chest and respiratory muscles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the respiratory center and the respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). Methods. The observational retrospective cross-sectional study included 74 post-COVID-19 patients (56 (76%) men, median age - 48 years). Spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of lung diffusing capacity (DLCO), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), and airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 sec (P0.1) were performed. In addition, dyspnea was assessed in 31 patients using the mMRC scale and muscle strength was assessed in 27 of those patients using MRC Weakness scale. Results. The median time from the COVID-19 onset to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was 120 days. The total sample was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 - P0.1 <= 0.15 kPa (norm), 2 - > 0.15 kPa. The lung volumes, airway resistance, MIP, and MEP were within normal values in most patients, whereas DLCO was reduced in 59% of cases in both the total sample and the subgroups. Mild dyspnea and a slight decrease in muscle strength were also detected. Statistically significant differences between the subgroups were found in the lung volumes (lower) and airway resistance (higher) in subgroup 2. Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlations between P0.1 and ventilation parameters. Conclusion. Measurement of P0.1 is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing pulmonary function. In our study, an increase in P0.1 was detected in 45% of post-COVID-19 cases, possibly due to impaired pulmonary mechanics despite the preserved pulmonary ventilation as well as normal MIP and MEP values.Copyright © Savushkina O.I. et al., 2023.
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives: During COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential to detect patients potentially at risk of life-threatening complications, due to possible specific genetic mutations. The aim of our work is to show a practical application of genetic testing, allowing a diagnosis of alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency in cases with a severe clinical course during COVID-19 infection. Method(s): During hospitalization for COVID-19, we identified 5 patients (3 female, 2 males from two different families, age range 18-47 years) with a severe course of COVID-19 infection, requiring high pressure ventilation with high volume oxygen supply. Two months after discharge, those patients were reevaluated with respiratory function tests, biochemical tests, genetic counselling and genetic testing. A peripheral blood sampling for SERPINA1 genetic testing has been performed, using Sanger sequencing. Result(s): Two months after discharge, in all 5 patients respiratory function tests were consistent with a dysventilatory obstructive syndrome, in contrast with usual findings related to COVID-19 infection. Blood test still showed increase plasmatic transaminase concentration in 3 out of 5 patients, one having increased serum bilirubin as well. We performed SERPINA1 genetic testing showing homozygosity for SERPINA1 pathogenic mutations (c.193del and c.875C>T, respectively) in all 5 patients. Conclusion(s): These cases showed the importance of genetic testing for patients with unexplained severe COVID-19 infection. Genetic testing allowed the diagnosis of cases affected by alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency, associated with dysventilatory obstructive syndrome, that may worsen the short and long term prognosis of COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: It is well documented that survivors of ICU admissions struggle to return to pre-admission level of function because of both physical and psychological burden. Current guidance therefore recommends a follow-up service to review patients 2-3 months post discharge [NICE 2009]. Prior to 2020 University Hospitals Bristol and Weston had no such service. With the increase in patient numbers seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, funding was received to provide a follow-up clinic to COVID-19 survivors. Objective(s): To provide a service that supports and empowers patients with their recovery from critical illness. Improving quality of life, speed of recovery and reducing longer term health care needs. Method(s): Referral criteria for the clinic included COVID-19 patients who received advanced respiratory support within intensive care and the high dependence unit. 8 weeks post discharge patients had a telephone appointment where ongoing symptoms could be identified. Advice around recovery, signposting to resources and onward referrals to appropriate specialities were provided. At 10 weeks post discharge patients had lung function tests and a chest X-ray which were reviewed by respiratory consultants. Based on the combination of these assessments, patients would be discharged or referred into the multidisciplinary team (MDT) follow-up clinic. The face to face clinic consisted of appointments with an intensivist, clinical psychologist, physiotherapist, and occupational therapist. Where needed patients would also be seen by a speech and language therapist or dietitian. Patients were seen only once in follow up clinic but again would be referred onto appropriate services within trust or the community, including but not exclusively community therapy services, secondary care services, SALT, dietetic or psychology clinics. Result(s): One of the key outcomes was the need for 147 onward referrals (an average of 1.13 referrals per patient). This included, 31 referrals to musculoskeletal physiotherapy outpatients for problems originating or made worse by their admission. 20 referrals to secondary care, including cardiology and ENT. 16 referrals to community occupational therapy, for provision of equipment, home adaptations and support in accessing the community. Subjectively, patient feedback was excellent. When asked what they felt was the most valuable thing they had taken from the clinic they reported: "Reassurance";"To know I'm not alone, others feel like this";"They listened to me and gave advice";"The ability to ask anything I wanted and the obvious kindness and support from all the clinicians I saw". Conclusion(s): Onward referral rates made by the follow-up clinic highlight the many issues faced by patients following discharge from ICU and hospital. With timely recognition and management, we can prevent a majority of these symptoms manifesting into chronic problems. This has the potential to lower the long-term burden on health care and improve quality of life for patients in both the short and long term. Without the follow-up clinic, these issues may have been missed or delayed. This reinforces the importance of the follow-up clinic and the need for ongoing investment.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Posterior mediastinal mass is most likely due to neurogenic tumor, meningocele or thoracic spine lesions. Caudate lobe of the liver herniation presenting as posterior mediastinal mass is a rare occurrence. Diaphragmatic herniation (DH) of the caudate lobe presents in various way including dyspnea, dyspepsia or incidental finding on imaging. We present a case of diaphragmatic hernia of the caudate lobe of the liver presenting as a posterior mediastinal mass found during evaluation of dyspnea. Case Description/Methods: A 75-year-old female presented to her physician with worsening shortness of breath from her baseline of 3 days duration. She had a history of sarcoidosis, COVID pneumonia over 1 year ago, COPD, diastolic heart failure, and hypertension. She was initially evaluated for COVID re-infection, which was negative and a CT of the chest with contrast to check for sarcoidosis flare revealed posterior mediastinal mass measuring 4.5 x 6.5 x 6.4 cm. Further work up with CT chest and abdomen with contrast revealed that the posterior mediastinal mass had similar attenuation as the liver and appears continuous with the caudate lobe of the liver. This was confirmed by NM scan of liver. Review of her records from an outside organization revealed similar finding on imaging a few years ago. Patient denied any history of trauma and laboratory work up revealed normal liver functions. After pulmonologist evaluation she was started on 2 L home oxygen following six-minute walk test, and also CPAP following a positive sleep study. Pulmonary function tests were performed and inhalers were continued. Given the chronicity of her symptoms and co-morbidities with stable caudate lobe herniation, conservative management was advised with surgery warranted if symptoms persist despite treatment (Figure 1). Discussion(s): DH is typically found on the left side with stomach or intestine while the right side is usually guarded by the liver. Isolated herniation of part of the liver into the thoracic cavity is rarely reported and is mostly acute from traumatic or spontaneous rupture requiring immediate repair. Our patient was initially evaluated for the posterior mediastinal mass for concerns of tumor, followed by the finding of what was thought to be acute herniation of the caudate lobe of liver into the thoracic cavity. Review of records showed this to be a stable lesion, we suspect that the patient had congenital diaphragmatic defect. Chronic and stable liver herniation into thoracic cavity can be managed conservatively if uncomplicated.
ABSTRACT
Background: In the light of post severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) Pneumonias playing a role in the long-term respiratory complications in patients subsequently involved in trauma, a study was conducted to assess the post COVID-19 Pneumonias on the prognosis of trauma patients in a Tertiary care Hospital of Telangana. Aim of the Study: To identify the post COVID-19 pneumonia and respiratory complications, their severity, factors affecting the management of trauma patients and the long-term sequelae. Materials: 42 patients categorized on American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) injury scoring scales were included. Patients aged between 18 and 70 years were included. Patients with previous history of post COVID-19 lung disease for 09 months or above were included. Pulmonary function tests like FEV1, FVC, TLC and DLCO were performed and analyzed. The CT scan signs were based on the involvement of the lung parenchyma as: Normal CT (no lesion), minimal (0-10%), moderate (11-25%), important (26-50%), severe (51-75%), and critical (>75%). Result(s): 42 patients with trauma with either COVID-19 disease affecting the lungs or RTPCR positive were included. There were 29 (69.04%) male patients and 13 (30.95%) female patients with a male to female ratio of 2.23:1. The mean age among the men was 41.55+/-3.25 years and 38.15+/-4.10 years in female patients. There were 33/42 patients with positive RTPCR test and 09/42 were negative for RTPCR test for COVID-19. Conclusion(s): Recovery from COVID-19 disease especially with lung parenchyma changes during the active state has shown to affect adversely the morbidity of post trauma surgeries. Preoperative assessment of Lung function tests such as FEV1, FVC, TLC and DLCO would guide the surgeon and the anesthetist in the surgical management of such patients.Copyright © 2023, Dr Yashwant Research Labs Pvt Ltd. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The respiratory pump that provides pulmonary ventilation includes the respiratory center, peripheral nervous system, chest and respiratory muscles. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of the respiratory center and the respiratory muscles strength after COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease 2019). Methods. The observational retrospective cross-sectional study included 74 post-COVID-19 patients (56 (76%) men, median age - 48 years). Spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of lung diffusing capacity (DLCO), maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), and airway occlusion pressure after 0.1 sec (P0.1) were performed. In addition, dyspnea was assessed in 31 patients using the mMRC scale and muscle strength was assessed in 27 of those patients using MRC Weakness scale. Results. The median time from the COVID-19 onset to pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was 120 days. The total sample was divided into 2 subgroups: 1 - P0.1 <= 0.15 kPa (norm), 2 - > 0.15 kPa. The lung volumes, airway resistance, MIP, and MEP were within normal values in most patients, whereas DLCO was reduced in 59% of cases in both the total sample and the subgroups. Mild dyspnea and a slight decrease in muscle strength were also detected. Statistically significant differences between the subgroups were found in the lung volumes (lower) and airway resistance (higher) in subgroup 2. Correlation analysis revealed moderate negative correlations between P0.1 and ventilation parameters. Conclusion. Measurement of P0.1 is a simple and non-invasive method for assessing pulmonary function. In our study, an increase in P0.1 was detected in 45% of post-COVID-19 cases, possibly due to impaired pulmonary mechanics despite the preserved pulmonary ventilation as well as normal MIP and MEP values.Copyright © Savushkina O.I. et al., 2023.
ABSTRACT
Introduction/Aim: Medium and long-term impacts of COVID-19 pneumonitis are being increasingly recognised. Our study aimed to evaluate outcomes of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe respiratory compromise. Method(s): Patients admitted to a tertiary centre with COVID-19 pneumonitis (March 2020-October 2022) were followed in the Post-COVID Respiratory Clinic at 6-24 weeks. Baseline demographics, admission details, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and clinic data were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to investigate for predictors of persisting respiratory symptoms (dyspnoea, cough, chest pain) and functional limitation (self-reported). Result(s): 125 patients (64.8%male, 63.2+/-16.7years, 42.5% former/current smokers, BMI 31.0+/-8.0kg/m2, 49.6% fully vaccinated) with median follow-up time of 85 [interquartile range (IQR) 64-131] days were included. Pre-existing conditions included lung disease (29.6%), immunocompromise (15.2%), diabetes (24.8%) and hypertension (43.6%). 35.2% required ICU care (14.4% mechanical ventilated, 4% ECMO), 44.8% received high flow nasal prong oxygen and/or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). At initial clinic follow up, 65.4% had persisting X-ray changes. Mean predicted FEV1, FVC, DLCO were 86.8+/-20.7%, 85.3+/-20.3%, 82.2+/-19.8% respectively. Symptoms included dyspnoea (63.2%), fatigue (24.2%), cognitive dysfunction (12.9%) and musculoskeletal complaints (10.5%). Univariate predictors of continued respiratory and/or functional disability included age [odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95%confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.06, p = 0.01), prior lung disease (OR2.98, 95%CI 1.05-8.48, p = 0.04), hypertension OR2.61, 95%CI 1.09-6.22, p = 0.03) and length of hospital stay (LOHS) (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.07, p = 0.04). On multivariable analysis, only LOHS was independently predictive of continued respiratory and functional limitations (OR1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.07, p = 0.02). Conclusion(s): Patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonitis have a large burden of disability at follow-up. Older age, hypertension, lung disease and LOHS are risk factors for delayed recovery.
ABSTRACT
Purpose of Study: The post-acute sequelae of COVID-19, as a multisystemic disease have been described in adults. Although some studies have described the pulmonary complications up to 3 months post-COVID infection, longitudinal data on pulmonary sequalae are sparse. The objective of this review was to summarize the findings of studies that included a longitudinal follow-up of patients with moderate to severe pulmonary COVID-19 infection. Methods Used: We performed a literature search using Pubmed, Google Scholar and Medline using key words: "pulmonary function test", PFT?, "long-COVID", longitudinal? and sequalae?. We included studies of adult patients (>18 years of age) who had been hospitalized with acute COVID-19 infection and had at least two follow-ups with PFT measurements, including one follow-up at least 6 months post-infection. Studies that did not account for co-morbidities and other lung diseases or those which only included one-time follow-up were excluded. Summary of Results: Five studies satisfied our inclusion criteria (See Table). The studies showed persistent lung injury for at least 3 months after discharge, with decreased forced expiratory volume (FEV1), total lung capacity (TLC), forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusion vital capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DCLO) and carbon monoxide transfer coefficient (KCO). Although these values improved at 6 and 12 months of follow-up, those with more severe disease continued to have decreased DLCO suggestive of restrictive lung damage. Studies that included symptomatic assessment revealed that a minority of patients continued with fatigue and dyspnea uf to 12 months after the infection. The limitations of the studies include availability of data from a single center, small sample size and the variability in controlling for different co-morbidities. In addition, baseline PFT measurement before COVID-19 infection was not available for most patients. Most of the studies were done at the time that the Delta variant was dominant, therefore the data may not be applicable to other variants. Conclusion(s): Our literature review shows that some adult patients hospitalized with acute covid pulmonary infection continue to have abnormal PFTs for up to 12 months after infection. Although PFTs improve overtime, a minority of patients with more severe disease on admission continue with abnormal functional abnormalities, specifically restrictive ventilatory pattern with impaired DLCO at 12 months of follow-up. It is important that patients hospitalized with moderate to severe pulmonary COVID-19 infection be followed up and managed for at least 12 months after the initial infection. Larger prospective studies including different variants of COVID-19 that take into account various co-morbidities and different management strategies are warranted.
ABSTRACT
The lung is the most common organ affected by sarcoidosis. Multiple tools are available to assist clinicians in assessing lung disease activity and in excluding alternative causes of respiratory symptoms. Improving outcomes in pulmonary sarcoidosis should focus on preventing disease progression and disability, and preserving quality of life, in addition to timely identification and management of complications like fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis. While steroids continue to be first-line therapy, other therapies with fewer long-term side-effects are available and should be considered in certain circumstances. Knowledge of common clinical features of pulmonary sarcoidosis and specific pulmonary sarcoidosis phenotypes is important for identifying patients who are more likely to benefit from treatment.Copyright © ERS 2022.
ABSTRACT
Objective Asesmentof lung function impairment after mild SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-hospitalized children and adults. Additionally focusing on previous and persistent symptoms due to Covid-19 as well as current respiratory tract infection status. Methods Patients aged 6-60 years were recruited by telephone after laboratory-confirmed positive PCR result for SARS-CoV-2. Excluding criteria were hospitalization during Covid-19, pre-existing lung diseases (bronchial asthma, COPD) and smoking within the last five years. Pulmonary function testing was performed 4-12 weeks after infection, including Multiple-breath washout (LCI), spirometry (FEV?, FVC, Tiffeneau-Index) and diffusion capacity testing (DLCO, TLC;Hb corrected). All patients answered a questionnaire regarding previous and persistent symptoms. To gather information about the current infection status, a pharyngeal swab was taken to detect common respiratory bacterial and viral pathogens using a multiplex PCR approach. Patients with abnormalities in pulmonary function were invited to a follow up testing three months later. Results 110 patients, 90 adults and 20 children, were included. 44 adults and 17 children had at least one abnormal value in pulmonary function tests after an average of 7.7 weeks (range 4.3-11.3) to confirmed SARS-Cov-2 infection. Among these 44 adults, 33 reported pulmonary symptoms during Covid-19 and 19 persistent respiratory symptoms. No abnormalities in DLCO were found in adults. At the second pulmonary function testing 12.5 weeks (range 11.0-16.7) on average after the first appointment, improvement was shown in 61,7% ( n=29 of 47) with previous abnormal LCI, in 69,2% (n=9 of 13) with prior abnormal FVC and in 4 of 5 children with abnormal DLCO. No large correlation was detected between impaired pulmonary function and multiplex PCR results. Conclusion Mild lung function impairment was shown at the first appointment, particularly in LCI, but not equally measured in the entirety of lung function tests. Pulmonary function results were not affected by current infection status and partially mismatching with stated persisting symptoms. Within 3 months, most initially abnormal values improved, and self- perceived health status increased. Long term pulmonary function impairment was rarely detected after mild, non-hospitalized Covid-19 course. .
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 infection was discovered to be the major global cause of a serious respiratory illness toward the end of 2019. The majority of COVID-19 patients experience mild disease, while about 14% go on to have severe disease and 6% end up in critical condition. An evidence-based standard of therapy called pulmonary rehabilitation includes exercise-training, education, and behavior modification to help people had a lung illness feel better physically and mentally. Aim(s): current study aimed to evaluate the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation program on severe post covid19 patients (post hospitalization) regarding pulmonary function tests and dyspnea score. Method(s): Randomized control experimental study design enrolled 100 patients of post hospitalization due to severe COVID 19 infection. Dyspnea score, Spirometry and 6-minute walk test were performed upon discharge. Pulmonary rehabilitation program in the form of respiratory exercises and walking exercise was done to 50 patients. Follow up assessment of the same parameters was done 6 weeks after the program. Other 50 patients had no pulmonary rehabilitation program to them. Result(s): Post COVID-19 cases in the experimental group show much improvement in percentage of normal breathing score (mMRC) 30% versus no cases in control group. In addition, the experimental group showed a significant higher percentage of normal spirometry findings (66% versus 28% in control group). As regards oxygen saturation, 6MWT score and distance, it showed a higher mean after practicing the exercise program. Conclusion(s): pulmonary rehabilitation program was effective in achieving much improvement in recovery of severe cases of COVID 19 infection.Copyright © 2021 Muslim OT et al.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic decrease in clinic visits for essential health care needs for individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF), but the decline in in-person visits was accompanied by a rapid pivot by many CF care centers to provide telehealth services, similar to the U.S. health care system as a whole. In the absence of in-person visits, we hypothesized that individuals with CF who used telehealth services would be more likely to meet standard of care as defined by Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) guidelines than individuals who did not use or did not have access to telehealth. We also hypothesized that telehealth use or access would be lower in particular demographic groups based on disparities seen in non-CF telehealth studies. Method(s): We used 2019 and 2020 data from the U.S. CFF Patient Registry (CFFPR) to describe patterns of telehealth use and evaluate associations between patient-level characteristics and use of telehealth in 2020 to achieve standard of care. We quantified the extent to which persons with CF received the recommended components of the care model, comparing 2019 and 2020. A risk factor analysis was implemented to identify patient characteristics associated with attaining standard of care and use of any telehealth in 2020 using multivariable logistic regression. Result(s): A total of 28,132 CFFPR participants were included in the study. The proportion of individuals meeting the individual standards of CF care was lower in 2020 than 2019 for every indicator and lower in adults than in children. In 2020, telehealth use was high among CFFPR participants, with 71% of children and 73% of adults reporting one or more telehealth encounter. In adults, demographic, socioeconomic and CF-related disease covariateswere significantly associated with achieving the overall standard of care and use of telehealth. In the pediatric population, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and markers of lower socioeconomic status were associated with lower odds of telehealth use. In all analyses, having received the standard of care in 2019 was associated with higher odds of reported telehealth use (odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95% CI, 1.16-1.41 in children) and achieving the recommended elements of the CF care model in 2020 (OR 2.36, 95% CI, 2.11-2.64 in children;OR 2.61, 95% CI, 2.19-3.12 in adults). Conclusion(s): Fewer individuals with CF met standards of care in the United States in 2020 than in 2019, probably because of pandemic-related effects, although use of telehealth services increased adherence to some standards of care, such as four or more encounters of any type, mental health screening, and annual ancillary consultations, but not four pulmonary function tests or bacterial cultures annually. The analysis suggests that there are disparities in access to telehealth services. Adults or children who were Black or Hispanic or whose self or parents had lower levels of education had lower odds of telehealth use. Overall, CF care centers in the United States have proven remarkably adept in pivoting care models during the pandemic, and some aspects of these models are important to be retained in a post-pandemic era.Copyright © 2022, European Cystic Fibrosis Society. All rights reserved
ABSTRACT
Background. Environmental factors such as infections and vaccines are known to trigger dermatomyositis (DM), and during the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic this has become even clearer. SARS-CoV-2 infection may share features with anti-MDA5 DM, such as rapidly progressive lung involvement, cutaneous lesions and cytokine release syndrome. A few case reports of DM following SARSCoV-2 vaccination have been published, suggesting the onset of an aberrant immune response leading to DM with specific autoantibody signatures and severe organ impairment. Methods. Clinical and laboratory data of the 2 case reports were obtained from electronic clinical charts in Humanitas Research Hospital (Rozzano, Milan, Italy). Autoantibody analysis was performed by protein-immunoprecipitation for anti-MDA5 and immunoblot for anti-Ro52 and TIF1gamma antibodies as per protocol. Results. Case report 1 is a 71-year-old woman who developed fever, cough, and anosmia, which resolved spontaneously in two weeks, but did not undergo a nasopharyngeal swab, while her relatives were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. When symptoms improved, she developed arthralgia and skin lesions on her face, chest, and hands for which she started topical treatment, with negative SARSCoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab and positive serum test for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. For the persistence of the skin rash and arthralgia, she was admitted to our Department in March 2021. Blood tests showed mild elevation of C reactive protein (2.1 mg/L -normal value NV<5), aspartate (84 UI/L) and alanine aminotransferase (133 UI/L -NV<35), ferritin (595 ng/ml -NV<306), troponin I (19 ng/L -NV<14), and BNP (251 pg/ml -NV<100) with normal complete blood cell count, creatine kinase, C3 and C4. IgG antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were confirmed to be elevated (96 AU/ml -NV<15). Autoantibodies associated with connective tissue diseases were tested and only anti-MDA5 antibodies were positive at immunoprecipitation. A punch biopsy of a Gottron-like lesion on the left hand showed leukocytoclastic vasculitis. We observed reduced capillary density with neoangiogenesis and ectasic capillaries at the nailfold capillaroscopy. EKG and ecocardiography were normal, while cardiac magnetic resonance detected abnormalities in the parametric sequences, consistent with signs of previous myocarditis. A lung CT scan revealed pulmonary emphysema while respiratory function tests demonstrated reduced volumes (FVC 82%, FEV1 64%, inadequate compliance CO diffusion test). Based on the biochemical and clinical findings, a diagnosis of anti-MDA5-associated DM with skin and heart involvement was made and treatment with low-dose methylprednisolone (0.25 mg/kg daily) and azathioprine 100 mg was started, then switched to mycophenolate because not effective on skin lesions. Case report 2 is an 84-year-old woman with history of colon cancer (surgical treatment) and oral lichen treated with low doses steroids in the last 2 years. After the 2nd dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, in March 2021 she developed skin rash with V-sign, Gottron's papules, periungueal ulcers, muscle weakness and fatigue, thus she performed a rheumatologic evaluation. Blood tests showed mild elevation of creatine kinase (484 UI/L, NV <167), CK-MB (9.6ng/ml, NV <3.4), BNP (215 pg/ml -NV<100) with normal values of complete blood cell count, C3 and C4. Anti-Ro52kDa and TIF1gamma were positive at immunoblot, thus we confirmed a diagnosis of DM. The clinical evaluation also showed active scleroderma pattern at nailfold capillaroscopy, normal echocardiography, bronchiectasia but not interstitial lung disease at lung CT, and normal respiratory function tests (FVC 99%, FEV1 99%, DLCO 63%, DLCO/VA 81%). A PET-CT scan was performed to exclude paraneoplastic DM, and treatment with steroids and mycophenolate was started. Conclusions. SARS-CoV-2 may induce mechanisms for escaping the innate immunity surveillance and causing autoimmune diseases, but more clinical and functional studies are needed to demonstrate this possible association.
ABSTRACT
Objective: Identify lung sequelae of COVID-19 through radiological and pulmonary function assessment. Design(s): Prospective, longitudinal, cohort study from March 2020 to March 2021. Setting(s): Intensive Care Units (ICU) in a tertiary hospital in Portugal. Patient(s): 254 patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU due to respiratory illness. Intervention(s): A chest computed tomography (CT) scan and pulmonary function tests (PFT) were performed at 3 to 6 months. Main variables of interest: CT-scan;PFT;decreased diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO). Result(s): All CT scans revealed improvement in the follow-up, with 72% of patients still showing abnormalities, 58% with ground glass opacities and 62% with evidence of fibrosis. PFT had abnormalities in 94 patients (46%): thirteen patients (7%) had an obstructive pattern, 35 (18%) had a restrictive pattern, and 58 (30%) had decreased DLCO. There was a statistically significant association between abnormalities in the follow-up CT scan and older age, more extended hospital and ICU stay, higher SAPS II and APACHE scores and invasive ventilation. Mechanical ventilation, especially with no lung protective parameters, was associated with abnormalities in PFT. Multivariate regression showed more abnormalities in lung function with more extended ICU hospitalization, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, invasive mechanical ventilation, and ventilation with higher plateau pressure, and more abnormalities in CT-scan with older age, more extended ICU stay, organ solid transplants and ventilation with higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Conclusion(s): Most patients with severe COVID-19 still exhibit abnormalities in CT scans or lung function tests three to six months after discharge.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Among the paediatric population there was no increase in asthma related morbidity with COVID-19. This study aimed to evaluate the pattern of the lung function tests after SARS CoV-2 infection. Method(s): Retrospective characterization of 79 paediatric patients with lung function tests performed after 6-8 weeks of SARS-CoV- 2 infection, between March 2020 and December 2021. Some endpoints were analysed like asthma as a comorbidity, lung function measurements, body mass index (BMI) and hospitalizations. Result(s): The mean age of this sample was 12.2 +/- 2.1 years old [4;17], 59% were male and 53% had asthma. The non asthmatic children were younger (10.1 +/- 1.8 years old). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for all patients at the time of lung function test, 56% had a normal weight (n = 40), 37.9% were overweight (n = 30), and 11.3% (n = 9) were obese. More than a half of the non asthmatic group had a normal weight (58%, n = 24), 33% were overweight (n = 10) and 33% were obese (n = 3). In the asthma group, 40% (n = 16) had a normal weight, 67% were overweight or were obese (n = 20 and 6, respectively). None of the involved children had restrictive pattern post COVID-19, nor an obstruction, and as for diffusion tests, all the results were in between the limits of normality. Only one non asthmatic patient was hospitalised. Three asmathic patients reported post COVID-19 symptoms, like tiredness, hyposmia, and chest pain for a period of 6 month at least, as well four non asthmatic patients, with similar symptoms. Conclusion(s): Taking into account lung function tests performed after COVID-19 infection, there was no negative impact in asmathic/non asthmatic children outcomes. However there is a higher proportion of asmathic overweighted/obese children with COVID-19 infection, which reinforce that metabolic syndrome seems to play an important role on this disease.
ABSTRACT
Background: Multiple studies have described acute effects of the Covid-19 infection on the heart, but little is known about the long-term cardiac and pulmonary effects and complications after recovery. The aim of this analysis was to deliver a comprehensive report of symptoms and possible long-term impairments after hospitalization because of Covid-19 infection as well as to try to identify predictors for Long-Covid. Method(s): This was a prospective, multicenter registry study. Patients with verified Covid-19 infection, who were treated as in-patients at our dedicated Covid hospital (Clinic Favoriten), have been included in this study. In all patients, testing was performed approximately 6 months post discharge. During the study visit the following tests and investigations were performed: Detailed patient history and clinical examination, transthoracic echocardiography, electrocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), chest computed tomography (CT) scan, lung function test and a comprehensive list of laboratory parameters including cardiac bio markers. Result(s): Between July 2020 and October 2021, 150 patients were recruited. Sixty patients (40%) were female and the average age was 53.5+/-14.5 years. Of all patients, 92% had been admitted to our general ward and 8% had a severe course of disease, requiring admission to our intensive care unit. Six months after discharge the majority of patients still experienced symptoms and 75% fulfilled the criteria for Long-Covid. Only 24% were completely asymptomatic (figure 1). Echocardiography detected reduced global longitudinal strain (GLS) in 11%. Cardiac MRI revealed pericardial effusion in 18%. Furthermore, cardiac MRI showed signs of former peri-or myocarditis in 4%. Pulmonary CT scans identified post-infectious residues, such as bilateral ground glass opacities and fibrosis in 22%. Exertional dyspnea was associated with either reduced forced vital capacity measured during pulmonary function tests in 11%, with reduced GLS and/or diastolic dysfunction, thus providing evidence for a cardiac and/or pulmonary cause. Independent predictors for Long-Covid were markers of a more severe disease course like length of in-hospital stay, admission to an intensive care unit, type of ventilation as well as higher NT-proBNP and/or troponin levels. Conclusion(s): Even 6 months after recovery from Covid-19 infection, the majority of previously hospitalized patients still suffer from at least one symptom, such as chronic fatigue and/or exertional dyspnea. While there was no association between fatigue and cardiopulmonary abnormalities, impaired lung function, reduced GLS and/or diastolic dysfunction were significantly more prevalent in patients presenting with exertional dyspnea. On chest CT approximately one fifth of all patients showed post infectious changes in chest CT including evidence for myo-and pericarditis as well as accumulation of pericardial effusions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Home hospital (HH) is hospital-level substitutive care delivered at home for acutely ill patients who would traditionally be cared for in the hospital. Despite HH programs operating successfully for years, and scientific evidence of similar or better outcomes compared to bricks and mortar care, HH outcomes in the US for respiratory disease have not been evaluated. RESEARCH QUESTION: Do outcomes differ between patients admitted to HH with acute respiratory illness vs other acute general medical conditions? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data of patients admitted to HH (2017-21). We compared patients requiring admission with respiratory disease (asthma exacerbation (26%), acute exacerbation for COPD [AECOPD] (33%), and non-COVID-19 pneumonia [PNA] (41%)) to all other HH patients. During HH, patients received 2 nurse and 1 physician visit daily, intravenous medications, advanced respiratory therapies, and continuous heart and respiratory rate monitoring. MAIN OUTCOMES: acute and post-acute utilization and safety. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,031 patients; 24% were admitted for respiratory disease. Patients with and without respiratory disease were similar: mean age 68 (SD, 17), 62% female, and 48% White. Respiratory patients were more often active smokers (21% vs 9%; p<0.001). FEV1/FVC ≤70 in 80% of cases; 28% had severe or very severe obstructive pattern (n=118). During HH, respiratory patients had less utilization: length of stay (mean days, 3.4 vs 4.6), laboratory orders (median, 0 vs 2), intravenous medication (43% vs 73%) and specialist consultation (2% vs 7%) (p all <0.001). 96% of patients completed the full admission at home with no mortality in the respiratory group. Within 30-days of discharge, both groups had similar readmission, ED presentation and mortality rates. INTERPRETATION: HH is as safe and effective for patients with acute respiratory disease as for those with other acute general medical conditions. If scaled, it can generate significant high-value capacity for health systems and communities, with opportunities to advance the complexity of care delivered.
ABSTRACT
Previous studies comparing treatment outcomes and the recovery of smokers after COVID 19 infection have yielded contradictory results. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare recovery and the rate of posthospital complications of former long-term smokers (FS) with non-smoking (NS) controls observed in PostCovid out-clinic hospital. We compared 88 FS and 96 NS, who had suffered from moderate to severe Covid-19 pneumonia, and were observed during 1-year follow-up period. The inclusion criteria were positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization due to acute respiratory failure. We compared lung function tests, blood gas analyses, onset of new symptoms and incidence of thrombotic incidents. Mean age of participants was 64.8+/-11.4 years for NS and 63.8+/-8.8 years for FS. At the beginning of follow-up FS group had significantly lower pulmonary function tests vs NS, including FEV1 (89.9% vs 94.6%, p<0.01);FVC (87.5% vs 94.3%, p< 0.01);DLco (62.3% vs 72.7%, p< 0.01), with a tendency for slower recovery during subsequent examinations. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding blood gas levels, number of reported symptoms and incidence of pulmonary embolism (7 vs 7). According to the results we can conclude that former smokers initially had worse lung function scores and prolonged recovery course. However, there was no significant difference in the number of symptoms and the frequency of thrombotic complications.